Hello, Claudia. If you could give us a sentence as an example, we would be happy to do so. Have you ever encountered this expression in a legal document? Of course, isn`t it? Especially in the case of contracts. But do you know what it really means and why it`s worded that way? If you join us, we will tell you. The first yes (formalize), with celebrate or subscribe, but the others have different meanings or connotations. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each Party has arranged for this Agreement to be signed by its duly authorized representative. In the previous sentence, we have already given you two good clues. And as proof of compliance, the parties sign this agreement through their duly authorized representatives. These are all very frequently asked questions that come to mind when we analyze this type of expression. In addition, [name of country] is required under international law to fulfil its obligations under the Convention in good faith. Each party warrants to the other that it has the right and the powers and powers necessary to sign this Agreement and any documents to be formalized. .
Many clients and colleagues have asked us about this formula. What is it used for, what does it mean, when is it used and for what purpose? Is this a redundant formula or is it really important? ● Translations of documents (team): ${teamDocuments} The parties undertake to carry out all actions and formalize all necessary documents (…). The signing of the document and the physical delivery of a copy were two ways in which the will to be bound was historically indicated. Thank you, Pablo. This is a good article. In fact, every text is a challenge and you have to be very careful. However, this last meaning of the term execute is not as common as the previous ones, so you will find them much less often. However, it is currently a completely dispensable expression that some authors recommend replacing or typing with characters. Results: 7.
Exactly: 7. Response time: 73 ms. . Currently, there is a lot of traffic in the free version of DeepL Translator. Your translation is ready in ${seconds} seconds. The text in question reads as follows: “The parties have signed this document and intend it to be submitted on the day and in the first year preceding the letter”, so that it is not possible to avoid duplicity by claiming that it is a duplicate. In this article, we analyze one of these expressions, which are common enough and ambiguous enough to raise many doubts. For promises that are not contracts, what would be the translation of the verb execute? Beware of this term, because often you will find it without the delivery company. Although most of the time it means the same thing we explained earlier, there may be a few exceptions and maybe you shouldn`t always translate it in the same way. Previously, in legal transactions formalized by an act (which we do not call a letter; see: What is an act and how is it different from our act), such as . B real estate sales, it was necessary for the parties to sign the document, attach its seal and give a copy to the ora parte. Therefore, the print is signed, sealed and delivered.
In addition, [name of country] is required under international law to comply in good faith with the obligations undertaken in the Convention. Like almost all of its genre (duplicates), it is a redundant expression fixed by the power of repetition. So if you want to use it in English, you have to do it in the same way. The first thing we need to clarify is that this is a typical duplicate of Anglo-Saxon (Legal German) legal jargon. Today, this formula does not make much sense, especially in a context where more and more contracts are concluded electronically, but the expression remains. This contract will be signed in London on the (…) The parties undertake to take all additional measures and to issue all additional documents if deemed necessary (…). Execute and Deliver is a traditional legal term used to indicate that the parties have signed or will sign the document in question. As in the next sentence. We`ve already told you about the archaic and traditional Anglo-Saxon legal language, haven`t we? Each party warrants to the other that it has the right, full power and authority to perform and deliver this Agreement and all documents to be performed by it. “Documents” containing agreements or obligations, permits, etc. be designed or formalized.
Would the meanings “formalize”, “give”, “perfect” or “legalize” be in the first sense of the word? Don`t log out: Keep the session open so your data is always safe We`re back today to include our English Legal Dictionary Anyway, keep an eye out, you know that legal English is full of pitfalls. I wanted to enrich your very reasoned entry with another “Signed but not delivered – why the mere fact of signing a deed does not make it enforceable” published by a British law firm www.glovers.co.uk/news-articles412.html I found in my research to distinguish what is usually a duplicate “execute and deliver”, but apparently in a final ritual formula of a contract, that I have in hand, it turns out that this is not always the case. Something that the previous post seems to confirm. The meaning of performance is quite simple: a contract has been performed if it has been signed on behalf of the party by a person authorized to act on behalf of the party. Common short expressions: 1-400, 401-800, 801-1200 eye, you should not translate it as “run and deliver”. Although this is the translation that Google gives us, by the way. You can and should replace the double with a single verb, like some of those suggested above. Reducing the double to a single word will not make it lose its meaning in our language.
In particular, double means signing, signing or concluding a contract or other document so that it can be translated with any of these verbs. And they are also signed, especially if this verb appears in the closing formula at the end of the contract: thanks to DeepL Pro, you can translate → at a higher speed, but, as Adams tells us again, to perform also means to fulfill a duty or fulfill the obligations provided for in a contract (perform / complete), which makes it an ambiguous term, with which one must be careful. .
